# Counting Numbers

Modern people often use real numbers to count time intervals. This is useful in many situations but it is also prone to serious errors. This article explains counting numbers and how they differ from real numbers. The reason? The Bible was written with counting numbers.

## Problem of Real Numbers

The modern world is different from the ancient world in several key
respects. The most noticeable is the amount of engineering used to build
modern infrastructure. Engineering, as we know it today, is based on advanced
mathematics called *Calculus*. Calculus is itself based on a system of counting
and measuring called *Real Numbers*.

Real Numbers are an important intellectual foundation because they allow
the continuous measurement of nearly all quantities. Even when the quantity
is not an even multiple of an abstract base unit, the use of real numbers
allow the expression of quantities to the limit of the observer’s ability to
measure. Measurements like 5.3 +/- .1 are
based on the real number system and include *tolerance* indicating to
anyone using the measurement the accuracy of the value in question

Real Numbers are also used as a basis for *Cartesian coordinate
systems*. Nearly everyone who has graduated High School understands the
use of graphs to express equations described in Algebra and Calculus using
mathematical functions. Conceptually coordinate systems can exist to any
number of dimensions, but 1 dimensional and 2 dimensional systems are common,
easy to understand, and easily drawn on graph paper.

Without hardly a moment of thought, most people drawing *time lines*
do so using a 1 dimensional *real number* based measurement system. This
is understandable since nearly everything else in the modern world is
measurable and thus understandable using such a system.

Nearly everyone who sets out to understand the time line of the Bible
makes the mistake of thinking that the Bible is supplying raw data, time
measurements, using the modern Real Number system. *It does
not.* Nor, for that matter, does the modern world consistently use
Real Numbers for the measurement of calendar time.

## Days, and Fractions Thereof

Think again about a measurement like 5.3 +/- .1.
If the quantity in question is *days* this can easily be
converted into hours when we know that days have 24 hours.

5.3 +/- .1 days = 5.3 +/- .1 days * 24 hours/day = 5.3 days * 24 hours/day +/- .1 days * 24 hours/day = 127.2 +/- 2.4 hours

This derivation was easy, and can be understood by most readers because of high school level algebra and science classes that deal with the math and the concept of measurement and error.

The unit conversion was also easy because *unit analysis* allows the
units of measurement to be treated like terms in the algebraic expression.

Now, take the original measurement and convert it to a
*calendar date*. Here things get tricky.

The actual point in time is some time in *day 6* not in day 5 as the
Real Number expression so readily suggests. 5.3 +/- .1*days* is 5 days +
7.2 hours. +/- 2.4 hours. This point in time is 7.2 +/- 2.4 hours inside
*day 6*.

If what is meant here is a time inside some week, then the day in question is day 6, Friday, by the historical convention of numbering the days in a week. Similarly, 5.3 days into some month would land on the 6th day of the month, not the 5th as some would suppose.

Why must the day number be shifted up by 1 when converting from the Real
Number value into the Calendar value? Because days are still measured using a
different numbering system. Days are measured using *Counting
Numbers*.

## Counting Numbers

Counting Numbers are different than real numbers in several key respects.
First, they begin at "1", there is no "0" in counting numbers. The
most well known historical example of counting numbers are *Roman
Numerals* which begin with **I** then **II** and so on. There is
no Roman Numeral for "zero" as there is never any need for zero in
systems based on Counting Numbers. The first
thing counted, whatever it may be is labeled "1". Each additional thing gets
a progressively higher number.

Generally speaking Counting Numbers are 1 higher than the Real Number equivalent. Converting backwards from a time given on a 6th day will yield a Real Number statement of the time as 5.X where is represents the time within the 6th day.

Counting numbers are still used by modern people to measure months in the year. January is the first month of the modern year. January is month number 1.

A survey of cornerstones on buildings and bridges built up through the early 1900s finds Roman Numerals used for the year number when the structure was completed. Roman Numerals are counting numbers.

Converting the month number backward into a Real Number for the same month, the value will be 0.X where X represents the time inside the month. This is not usually done because Month lengths are irregular. Typically the day-of-the-year is used instead when these conversions are made.

## Which System is used to count Years?

Because current year numbers are so large it does not make much difference, but technically speaking modern year numbers are expressed using Counting Numbers.

2050 is the counting number assigned to the specific year 2050. There was no year "0" because counting numbers have no such number. The first year in this series was the year "1".

If a date from within 2050 were converted into a Real Number, ready to be drawn on a Cartesian coordinate system graph, the time in question would be 2049.X where X represented the time inside 2050.

## Modern Astronomy

The year '0' does occur when modern astronomers run the modern calendar backwards to explain the ancient dates for phenomena they think happened in ancient times.

They use a real number system for their year numbers, as they must, since they are measuring events in time as scientists do. They are using a time scale, and accuracy, not used in any other scientific discipline.

When they give ancient dates before the year 1 they are using a pattern not actually used in history. This creates a type of date drift error that will be discussed later.

## Avoiding Mistakes in this Area

In order to accurately draw the time lines of the Bible several analytical steps must be followed.

First, the number system used to write the Bible must be understood.

Since Real Numbers are a recent, modern invention, it is likely, without even reading far in the Bible, that the Bible was written using Counting Numbers. The task here is simply to show that the Bible was written using Counting Numbers.

Second, there must be a strategy for drawing time lines stated using Counting Numbers.

Either an extensive system of Counting Number to Real Number conversions must be undertaken, or the time line itself must be drawn using something different than a 1 dimensional Cartesian coordinate system. Since the task of drawing a timeline involves accurately transferring numbers from the pages of the Bible to the timeline graph, the Bible’s time line must be drawn using something different than what everyone learned in school.

Though unconventional, this type of answer cleanly avoids the constant need for time conversions between Counting Numbers and Real Numbers. It also creates a graph that can be easily compared and audited against the exact numbers found in the text of the Bible.

## Closing Thoughts

I am frequently asked to edit and/or review various time lines drawn by
people who have attempted to follow the Bible’s chronology. Almost without
exception these time lines have been drawn using a Real Number,
Cartesian system, without any counting number to real
number conversion. **This always indicates error.** Over the range of years
covered by the Bible this error is often significant.

It is a major challenge to figure out how to draw the Bible’s time line and still avoid errors of this specific type. A challenge we turn to next.